joelrosenberg ([info]joelrosenberg) wrote,
@ 2005-05-17 15:50:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: annoyed

Argh!
Sometime around 4 this morning, somebody -- we don't know who, at the
moment -- apparently used the open-to-the-public CCRN web mailer to send an
email to at least many of the members of the Minnesota House.

That would be okay; that's what it's there for.

But they sent it using my name. That isn't okay.

And -- whoever it was -- cut and pasted yesterday's journal entry into their
email, and prefaced and interspersed it with threats. Lots of threats,
directed at any legislator who votes against the MCPPA. That not only
isn't okay, it's quite probably a crime, as well as a few other legal
wrongs, too. (And they added in some other silly stuff, too.)

It was a blatant, clumsy, and transparent attempt to derail the MCPPA
repassage. And it isn't going to work.

As soon as I heard about this, I called a friend of mine -- who is also my
attorney; his name is David Gross (I dedicated a book to him a few years
ago, if you don't mind a short digression) -- and he immediately called the
FBI and the Executive Protection folks at the Capitol. Since then, I've
been in direct contact with law enforcement, and, at the advice and
recommendation of my attorney, David Gross, am being fully cooperative, as
in "ask me what you want to ask, and I'll tell you what little I know, and
what I can surmise." I had a longish talk with one law enforcement officer
this morning, and -- I hope -- gave that officer some pointers as to how
they might be able to identify the person who forged my name and sent an
email.

Some people have stepped up to the plate. I've been -- and will be --
critical of Nora Slawik's opposition to the MCPPA. But Representative
Slawik quickly sent out an email to various news organizations, making it
clear that she not only understood that the email was forged (I'll give her
credit for that, but not too much; it's a pretty clumsy attempt), but that
she's got more integrity than to sit quiet and try to take political
advantage of the blackening of my name, and for that I'll give her a lot of
credit.

I hope the authorities quickly find whoever did this. I'm a fan of the
First Amendment, the Second Amendment, and the Sixth, as well -- and I'd
very much like this person to get a speedy, and very public trial.

More later.

[Update, May 22: Welcome Instapundit readers -- and thanks for mentioning this, Glenn. I'll be updating the blog on this hoax I was the target of when there's some news I can talk about publicly. Soon, I hope.]




(Post a new comment)


[info]cakmpls
2005-05-17 09:18 pm UTC (link)
Have you considered the possibility that it may not have been an "attempt to derail the MCPPA repassage" at all, but may have been an attack on you personally--possibly even by someone who doesn't care one way or the other about the MCPPA, but saw an opportunity?

In any case, I'm sorry it happened, and it sounds like it is being handled well all around.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]joelrosenberg
2005-05-17 10:23 pm UTC (link)
Yup; I've considered the possibilty, and think it unlikely.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Kudos to Rep. Slawik
[info]rrudd
2005-05-17 09:31 pm UTC (link)
It's nice to know that there are honorable politicians around.

I just sent a thank you to her.

(Reply to this)


[info]davidrn
2005-05-17 09:33 pm UTC (link)
Hopefully they will not have too much trouble figuring out who sent the e-mails. Not many library computers or local internet cafes are open to the public at 0400.

(Reply to this)


[info]faro
2005-05-17 10:03 pm UTC (link)
Hopefully the CCRN server logs the IP addresses of visitors to the web page.

(Reply to this)


[info]belt0033
2005-05-17 10:16 pm UTC (link)
I can't say I'm all that surprised. These are the kinds of tactics that people on the wrong side of an issue have to resort to. It's too bad they don't have enough of a sense of honor or integrity to restrain themselves though.

I'd very much like this person to get a speedy, and very public trial.

I'll second that.

(Reply to this)

Well let's wait a bit
[info]register651
2005-05-17 10:29 pm UTC (link)
Yes this was a stupid, cowardly and pathetic action by a truly thoughtless (at best) venal (most likely) and potentially dangerous (hope not but possible) individual. Joel for all his forthright and controversial views has always conducted this blog and his related activities honorably and decently. he does not deserve this slur obviously.

But the latest Strib report makes me think this really did come from a pro-carry person. Possibly given the time stamp a drunk or high one but that's no excuse. It would take a degree of machiavellian machinations I haven't seen in the anti-side to date to use those little jabs at Wes Skoglund of which we are so fond - the email mentioned window peeking front and center you'll note. It's also not histrionic enough to be much of an intentional slight against gun owners by anyone that clever. If I had to come up with sometyhing intentionally embarrassing to gun owners for the anti side I'd be much more likely to talk about cold dead hands and jackbooted thugs and talk about my god given rights to take down illegal governments by force.

I'm of the opinion this is likely a thoughtless and probably drunken tirade of a pro-carry guy who started off trying to be funny and got out of hand.

And that's sad but not not TOO sad. The actions of one or a few do NOT reflect on the rest of us and this is no more indicative of the pro-carry group in general than Ourada is of permit holders. It's just silly to think otherwise and no matter how we disagree with them and rhetoric aside I don't think house opponents are that stupid. Sure they'll make rhetorical hay, but even Slawik said this was one out of a "deluge" of emails.

Be proud to be part of the honorable deluge and not so quick to put all our hopes into the thought that the stupid one was a plant. It doesn't smell like one to me.

(Reply to this)


[info]johnalbert
2005-05-18 02:09 am UTC (link)
I have not read the e-mail in question, and quite frankly do not care if it was sent from an opponent or a proponent of the bill. If threats were made to our congressmen, a crime has been committed. We as permits holders pride ourselves as some of the most law-abiding citizens in society and are taught, as Joel has to me, what the consequences may be if we slip up, even if by mistake.
If this individual who sent the e-mails is in fact a permit holder, he should be prosecuted and the permit revoked by law. Our law! Again proving our law works.
The timing of the Nye’s shooting could not have been worse. But of course we know if a man is determined to commit murder his status as a permit holder would not discourage him, and most certainly not encourage him to do so. I hope our House members understand this.

John

(Reply to this)


[info]jdege
2005-05-18 02:31 am UTC (link)
That is the point.

We'd like to believe that this was an opponent. But whether this was an opponent or a disturbed and misguided supporter, it was a crime, and should be treated as such.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]joelrosenberg
2005-05-18 04:06 am UTC (link)
Amen. We'll know, sooner or later, who sent the fraudulent emails. And then ... well, let's understand that the FBI, BCA, and the Capitol Police have dibs.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]vfrdirk
2005-05-18 02:44 pm UTC (link)
Joel,

I heard a quick news blurb on AM1280 this morning. Although you weren't mentioned, neither was the fraudulent nature of the mailing. It basically said, "[authorities] are investigating a threatening e-mail sent out to legislators opposed to the carry law. The e-mail threatened lawmakers with harassment, window peeking, etc....." or something like that.

Reading what you posted, this seems to be a mischaracterization of what happened and lends credence to the "gun nut" fantasies of the opposition.

Dirk

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Very much agreed
[info]register651
2005-05-18 02:39 am UTC (link)
While nothing can make this idiocy "right", it is both the right thing to do AND (less importantly but still worth mentioning) the most vindicating outcome possible if such criminal thoughtlessness is soundly and overwhelmingly denounced and rooted out by those of us on the pro-carry side.

(Reply to this)

Nothing New -- Possible Solution
[info]brianpuccio
2005-05-21 03:17 pm UTC (link)
(I read this post by way of a link from Instapundit)

First, I'm sorry this happened, email forgery has happened to me more then once and it does indeed suck. Thankfully, I digitally sign all my emails to prove that it was me who did indeed send them. I advise you do the same. For more information, look at GPG, an implementation of the Open PGP standard.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…